[This Court’s assertion and the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff and the Defendant, even if examined, is reasonable to establish and determine the first instance court’s fact-finding with the exception of the following modifications. In particular, with respect to the Defendant’s assertion that denies liability for damages, it is difficult to find a clear evidence to reverse liability for damages arising from the criminal facts found guilty in the relevant criminal case (in relevant criminal cases, the Defendant denied criminal facts as in this case,

[) On the other hand, the part 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance states that "the defendant did not proceed with the sale and purchase of used cars" in the part 18 of the judgment of the court of first instance is not deemed to have consented to the payment of interest on the loan to the defendant himself, and that other partners, including the plaintiff, etc., such as the plaintiff, etc., were paid 1% interest per month on the sales company of this case (the defendant borrowed money without collateral and received interest on the loan to the defendant). On the other hand, it is deemed that at the time of opening the sales company of this case considering the fact that the defendant, a partner, had experience in the sale and purchase of used cars, was low [the defendant also argued that the defendant was to have engaged in the sales company of this case with the knowledge that it was purchased from D, one of its partners, and that it was proper to request the plaintiff et al. to make a loan from the sales company of this case to D].

Part 11 of the judgment of the first instance is set forth in the 2nd to 19th.