근로기준법위반등
All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged is the representative director of C in Pyeongtaek-si B, who is a user who manufactures electrical appliances using 30 full-time workers.
From April 6, 2012 to October 6, 2014, the Defendant, as well as workers E, F, G, H, H, I, J, M, M, N, P, P, Q, Q, M, M, X, A, Z, AB, AB, AC, AD, AE, AE, AE, AF, AF, AH, AH, AI, AJ, AJ, AJ, AmM, and the total amount of wages and retirement allowances of 251,625,914 won from the date of payment without agreement between the parties to the date of payment.
2. The above facts charged cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 109(1) of the Labor Standards Act, Article 109(2) of the Labor Standards Act, and the proviso of Article 44 of the Guarantee of Workers’ Retirement Benefits Act.
On August 10, 2015, the prosecution of this case was instituted on August 10, 2015, the victim E, F, G, H, I, K, K, L, M, N, P, Q, Q, M, T, U, V, X, Y, Z, AAB, Z, AC, AE, AE, AF, AF, AH, AJ, AJ, AJ, AK, AL, AL, and AM's authenticity withdrawal from the defendant on October 22, 2015, respectively.
Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.