However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[criminal records] On August 21, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Changwon District Court on September 19, 2014, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on September 19, 2014.

[Criminal facts] The Defendant, around May 2013, in Drasto C located in Namwon-si, Namwon-si, had been working as a postmaster at the branch office of the branch office of the Korea National Park Service. The Defendant would have his/her husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s wife employed as the Corporation’s technical position and have him/her be employed regularly after six months elapse.

In order to do so, money shall be given to the chairperson of the union.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, at the time of fact, the defendant was merely intended to make personal consumption of money from the injured party, and the injured party did not have an intention or ability to find employment of the injured party as a functional position of the National Park Management Corporation.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) received two million won in cash from the victim by deceiving the victim as above; (b) received the money from the victim; (c) received the money from the victim; and (d) obtained the money from the credit cooperative account in the name of the Defendant on May 22, 2013; (d) KRW 3 million on June 20, 2013; and (e) obtained the money from the victim on August 25, 2013; and (e) acquired the money by deceptioning KRW 16 million in total

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Each investigation report (the sequence 7, 9, 11, 12, 17 of the evidence list);

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of inquiries about criminal history and investigation reports (formers and attachment of written judgments) and statutes;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 347 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime (Selection of imprisonment with prison labor, considering the fact that the details and methods of deception are inadequate, and the amount of deception is not written);

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds that the defendant has agreed with the victim, that the defendant appears to reflect his/her wrong recognition, and that the crime for which a judgment has become final and conclusive and the case is