When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Defendant is an employee of Ccafeteria, while the victim E, who operates D cafeteria, was not able to conduct a usual appraisal as a matter of the fact that the victim’s shots come to C cafeteria with the wind of avoiding shots;

A. On August 25, 2014, around 16:00, the victim E (nives, 67 years of age) and the victim G (24 years of age) were at the top of the D restaurant located in the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, with his hand, frightened the victim’s head debt, scambling the bat, and bat the victim G (24 years of age) together with the victim G in the middle, and assaulted the victim G at one time by drinking when the victim G bats anywhere.

B. On August 31, 2014, at around 17:30, Ga.

While an employee in the name of the D cafeteria and a dispute occurred with the D cafeteria at the place indicated in the port, the victim was breadd by hand on the ground that the victim G was satched, and assaulted the victim by taking the victim's satch with his hand at one time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the G production;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;