In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100.

On August 25, 2016, the Defendants were sentenced to three years and six months of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Protection of Children’s Juveniles from Sexual Abuse at the Suwon Friwon, and the Defendants’ appeal was dismissed at the Seoul High Court, and the above sentence was finalized on December 24, 2016.

D was friendly with Defendant A, while trying to arrange sexual traffic by the Defendants during a day, but when receiving investigation, the Defendants denied the fact of participation, and the Defendants were willing to make a false testimony for D.

1. On May 3, 2016, Defendant A appeared at the court of Suwon District Court No. 110, May 3, 2016, Defendant A, as a witness of the above court’s violation of the Act on the Protection of Children’s Juveniles from Sexual Abuse (i.e., brokerage) against D, 2016.

The Defendant responded to the question of “Before 2015.4.28)” of the defense counsel’s “Before 2015.4.4.28, D” The Defendant responded to the question of “Before 2015.4.2. D” The Defendant responded to the question of “Before 2015.4 hours after the Defendant was not a witness,” “I am asked the witness whether he had been engaged in sexual traffic,” and “I am asked the witness whether he would have been able to engage in sexual traffic,” and “I am to the question of “I am not having been a witness according to D’s three to four hours and not having been involved in sexual traffic mediation.”

The question is that “I reply to the site,” “I wish to answer to the question,” “I wish to answer to the question,” and “I wish to answer the prosecutor’s “I wish to be engaged in sexual traffic, not in accordance with Defendant B, with the knowledge that I will be engaged in sexual traffic.”