beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2017.06.29 2017고정339

축산물위생관리법위반

Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

The Defendants did not pay the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person who runs a instant meat sales and processing business with the trade name “F” in Busan East-gu E.

The livestock products, the standards for labeling of which are determined, shall be marked in compliance with such standards.

Nevertheless, from September 5, 2016 to September 8, 2016, the Defendant sold to B livestock products (types: spiced meat and product name: Gag Gag Gag 6 packaging) that did not indicate the circulation deadline.

2. Defendant B is a person who runs a food entertainment business with the trade name, “H consensus point” in Article 113 of the Busan Metropolitan City Building GGGGGGG GGGGG 113.

Foods, etc., the standards for labeling are determined shall not be sold, imported, displayed or transported for sale, or used for business, unless they meet the standards.

Nevertheless, around September 8, 2016, the Defendant displayed meat products (type: Dolled meat and product name: Dolled Gag) with no distribution deadline indicated, 4 factorings (total 16kg packaging, total 16kg) with no distribution deadline indicated.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. Written statements prepared by the J;

1. On-site photographs (the Defendants and the defense counsel argued to the effect that there was no intention to commit each of the crimes of this case, since they had different knowledge that there was no indication of the distribution period in the labels of a new design in the process of replacing the Belgium design attached to packaging packaging packaging.

With respect to the facts charged in the instant case, the prosecutor indicted for applying Article 45(6)2 and Article 6(3) of the Livestock Products Sanitary Control Act, and the relevant statutes are as follows.

According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, it is recognized that the distribution period is not indicated on the packaging of livestock products as stated in the facts charged, and in light of the content and purport of the relevant statutes, the most important description on the packaging meat is indicated.