However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant committed a joint crime with D, E, and F, together with D, E, and F, intended to forge a pre-sale contract for an apartment and provide it as collateral to the borrower as collateral and to obtain money for the loan. The Defendant introduces to D, etc. a lender who is able to lend money as collateral for the pre-sale contract for an apartment that is forged by the Defendant, and as stated in the above pre-sale contract, he introduced the lender to E and F as if he were the lessor and lessee, and then he conspired to receive the loan in sequential order by using a forged pre-sale contract, such as having the borrower pay the loan brokerage fee to the Defendant after receiving the above pre-sale contract from the lender as collateral.

A. On October 10, 2012, the Defendant: (a) sent a copy of the pre-paid contract sent to C through I and sent it to D as a document duly formed; (b) on October 11, 2012, the Defendant sent a facsimile number of the regional number Incheon (032) to D; and (c) through D, sent a forged pre-paid contract (109 Dong-dong 203, Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, Ha, Ha: Ha, Ha, Ha: Ma: : E) and then sent the copy of the pre-paid contract sent to C through I as a document duly formed; (d) on October 11, 2012, E and F sent a copy of the pre-paid contract, which was sent to C through I, as if the office was aware of the forgery of the document in the name of H, the head of the pre-registered apartment contract and the 1st resident registration certificate.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with D, E, and F, exercised forged official documents and private documents.

B. The fraud Defendant, together with D, E, and F, committed in the said K notary office around October 11, 2012, and F as lessor H, and E is deemed as lessee to the victim C.