beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2019.03.13 2018고단1417

폭행등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2018 Highest 1417" is between the victim B (year 56) and his/her relative.

On June 1, 2018, at around 14:05, the Defendant, as a matter of smoking tobacco in Da located in Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si, said that, while making a dispute with the victim, the Defendant satisf with his left hand, dumped the victim’s bleeps over the floor by making the flat, and continued to be 14:25 on the same day, the police officers dispatched after receiving a report at the same place at around 112 on the same day, she saw that “the flat must be treated as the flat case.” The Defendant satddd

In this respect, the defendant assaulted the victim two times.

"2019 Highest 3"

1. On September 15, 2018, the Defendant of the obstruction of performance of official duties against auxiliary police officers E: (a) expressed that, around 14:05 September 15, 2018, the former North Korean Police Agency H, which controlled the vehicles illegally parked on the front of the G on the road located in the Sinsan-si F, and that, although E said, “Is are responsible for the duty to prevent traffic congestion, there is no authority to regulate the illegal parked vehicles”, the Defendant: (b) stated that “Iss their bicycles are installed on the two-lane roads to interfere with traffic flow of vehicles; (c) “Isknis, strokes, and nicks are well known; and (d) assaulted the E face five times in order to prevent traffic congestion; and (d) interfere with the legitimate performance of duties concerning the traffic control of auxiliary police officers.

2. The Defendant of the obstruction of performance of official duties against the Defendant of the police officer I refers to the Defendant: (a) the police box belonging to the military police station of the military police station that was called for contact with the police officer’s request for assistance at around 14:26 on the same day, that “The Defendant attempted to take care of the police officer who controlled the traffic, thereby arresting the Defendant as a flagrant offender of the obstruction of performance of official duties at this time; and (b) the Party may appoint a defense counsel and refuse to give any unfavorable statement.” (c) the Defendant attempted to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender of the obstruction of official duties as a flagrant offender of the obstruction of official duties.