특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that of the lower court’s punishment (one year and six months of imprisonment, confiscation, and return of victims) excessively unreasonable;
2. In light of the fact that the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes during the period of repeated crime due to the same crime, and the lower court sentenced the lower sentence by discretionary mitigation, taking into account the fact that damaged goods were temporarily returned or returned and a significant amount of damage was recovered, taking into account the fact that the Defendant’s punishment for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thief) was mitigated, and all of the sentencing conditions shown in the instant records and pleadings, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, home environment, the background and consequence of the crime, etc., even though considering the circumstance that the Defendant is against the Defendant
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.