특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(운전자폭행등)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. Although the gist of the grounds for appeal of this case is not clear to memory at the time of the instant crime, the victim’s statement is not reliable, and even if based on the statement of a witness, the fact of assault cannot be acknowledged.
2. Of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, there is a part of the evidence that the victim was subject to investigation by the police on the day when the crime of this case was committed and the victim was investigated by the police on the day of the crime of this case, and the victim was exposed to the victim's face once and once a drinking face from the defendant (Evidence No. 4). This is not consistent with the victim's police officer's statement or statement that he was exposed to the face once and once a drinking face once. It is recognized that the witness (D, 17 years old) who was transferred to the back of the taxi driven by the victim together with the defendant at the time of the crime of this case did not directly witness the crime of this case.
그러나 나머지 다른 증거들, 특히 피해자가 신고 직후 직접 작성한 진술서나 경찰 작성의 진술조서에 의하면 피해자가 술에 취한 피고인을 뒷좌석에 태우고 택시를 운전하던 중 한진사거리에서 신호대기 하다가 출발하여 교차로를 진행하고 있었는데, 피고인이 욕을 하더니 발로 얼굴을 걷어 찼고, 주먹으로 뒷머리를 1회 가격하였으며, 계속 발로 차려고 하여 간신히 택시를 세웠다는 취지로 기재되어 있는 사실, 한편 피고인과 함께 택시에 동승하였던 위 참고인은 조사 경찰관에게 이 사건 범행 당시 택시 창 밖을 보고 있어서 폭행 장면을 직접 목격하지는 못하였지만 한진사거리에서 신호대기 하다가 직진신호를 받아 교차로를 지나고 있을 때 피해자가 ‘악’ 하는 소리를 질러서 앞 쪽을 봤더니, 피고인의 발이 피해자의 옆 기어 위에 올려져 있었고, 그 직전에도 피고인이...