2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

In light of the evidence presented in the first instance court, even if the evidence was presented in this court, the presumption of independent possession based on the nature of the title, which caused the possession, has been broken, in view of the following factors: therefore, the fact-finding and judgment of the first instance court rejecting the Plaintiff’s claim for the completion of acquisition by prescription is justified.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is that "the result of the request for surveying and appraisal by the branch office strengthening the Korea Land Information Corporation" in the fourth 12th e.g., "the result of the request for surveying and appraisal by the branch office strengthening the Korea Land Information Corporation" in the first e.g., "M" in the first e., "P"; the fifth e.g., "M" in the fifth e., "N of the witness" in the second e., the fifth e., "N of the first e., the witness" in the second e., and the fourth e., "the result of inquiry by the office strengthening the first e.g., the head of the court" in the second e., "the result of inquiry by the office strengthening the first e., the head of the court of first e., the defendant or the plaintiff who is the landowner or the deceased," respectively in the first e.g., the main sentence of Article 20 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(However, the decision of the court of first instance is legitimate, so the plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.