Around 20:20 on December 3, 2013, the Defendant connected the Defendant’s house at Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, 105 Dong 702, and 702, the victim C’s Internet portal site following the victim C’s Internet portal site “EF,” and the victim made a statement on the “B” page of the University Debate 4 Publicity G, and made a copy of the statement without the complainant’s permission, and then made it to the Defendant’s D Blog, H HH, D Blog, D Blog, D Blogs, D Blogs, and D Blogs, which continued to be posted on the victim’s website at around 02:20 on December 4, 2013, and made it public to the victim’s website, and then made it public without the victim’s permission to make public notice, and made it public to the Defendant’s respective comments.”

Accordingly, the defendant infringed the author's property right by reproducing and distributing the victim's work.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement C to the Act

1. Article 136 (1) 1 of the Copyright Act (Selection of Fines) concerning the relevant legal provisions and the selection of punishment for crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of sentence;

A. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Considering that it is a primary offender, is a non-profit use, and that it acknowledges a mistake and reflects it)

(b) Fines postponed: Fines of 500,000 won; and

(c) Detention in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day);