사기
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. Around May 2, 2009, the Defendant against the victim D had a 5% share in the “F Korean Teachers’ Office” operated by the Defendant of 5th floor of the Gangnam-gu Seoul E building, Gangnam-gu, Seoul. Around May 22, 2009, the Defendant was under construction of Iwale to the Gangnam-gu, Gangnam-gu.
B. At the face of 100 million won, we will give 1% of the equity interest of the trading hole and give 500 to 70 million won per month.
“ ................”
However, the defendant did not have a right to share in the aforesaid trading hole, and it is unclear whether to build or acquire shares in the aforesaid trading hole, and the defendant planned to use shares in stock investment, etc. by receiving money from the damaged party, but there was no intention or ability to pay the victim a profit that he neglected or promised to pay.
On May 22, 2009, the Defendant acquired KRW 100,000 from the damaged party, by receiving KRW 100,000 from the Korean bank account (J) of the name of the Defendant.
2. On April 2009, the Defendant: (a) around early April 2009, on the part of the Victim K, at the “F Pool teacher” operated by the Defendant of the fifth floor of the Gangnam-gu Seoul E building, the Defendant was under construction of the Victim K with the Defendant “G” through the Defendant’s high mother L, which is the part of the Victim K in Gangnam-gu H; (b) the Defendant was to receive 5% of its shares.
B. If 100 million won is paid to B, 100 million won will be given 500 to 70 million won per month.
“ ................”
However, the defendant did not have a right to share in the aforesaid trading hole, and it is unclear whether to build or acquire shares in the aforesaid trading hole, and the defendant planned to use shares in stock investment, etc. by receiving money from the damaged party, but there was no intention or ability to pay the victim a profit that he neglected or promised to pay.
On April 15, 2009, the Defendant received from the injured party the remittance of KRW 50 million from the Korean bank account (J) of the name of the Defendant, and KRW 50 million from the same method on the 16th day of the same month.
Summary of Evidence
1...