At around 00:00 on January 16, 2018, the Defendant fell off with the victim E (39 tax) and shoulder at the entrance of the D shop in the Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do. Around 00:0, when the Defendant fell off with the victim E (39 taxes), he cut off the victim's shoulder, cut off the victim's head into the floor, cut off one time more, cut off the victim's shoulder, cut off the victim's shoulder again, cut off the back again, walking the victim's shoulder, walking down the victim's shoulder at a way, walking the victim's shouldered by nearby restaurants, walking the body of the victim, walkinging the body of the victim who followed by a nearby restaurant, ringing about 12 weeks the part of the back, and ring up the face of the victim with approximately 12 weeks treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. A criminal investigation report (CCTV reading), a criminal investigation report (to screen CCTVs around the site), and a criminal investigation report (CCTV verification);

1. A criminal investigation report, each investigation report, and each investigation report;

1. A CD in the D building image, a sarphograph, a CD in the sarfic image, and a photograph to close;

1. Each injury diagnosis certificate (E);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. Relevant Article 257 of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, grounds for sentencing of sentence of imprisonment, and grounds for sentencing;

1. Inflicting injury (1 and 4) in the aggravated area (six months to two years) (special aggravated persons) in the form of one kind (general injury) general, the scope of the sentencing criteria shall be applied [the scope of the recommended punishment] general injury;

2. In this case, in the decision of sentence sentence, the victim and the defendant are faced with shoulder, and the victim provided the horse of this case, and after the report, "I see when there is money" means that I am the defendant.

However, while the cause of the dispute is minor, the defendant has taken the victim over several times, and the face and body part of the victim who is unable to resist properly in that state have been discriminated against without any justification, and despite the detention around it.