If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. At around 18:00 on July 17, 2012, the Defendant repeated the desire of “sprinking” on the ground that the victim C (n, 72 years of age) in Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (n, and the 72 years of age) applied for the recovery system under the influence of alcohol, and repeated the desire of “sprinking” on the ground that the level of the drug value after drinking is sprinked, and took a bath against the unclaimed customers who found the pharmacy by taking a hump, and obstructed the operation of the pharmacy by force.

2. The Defendant got home from police officers who were reported by the victim C due to the act as referred to in the above Paragraph 1, and led home from the police officers who were dispatched to the above pharmacy, and repeated three times in order to put the pedagos into the said pharmacy and take a bath while taking the pedagos, etc., and repeated on three occasions, on July 17, 2012, the Defendant reported to the victim and the victim C by entering the said pharmacy into the said pharmacy and bringing about the pedagos, and thereby obstructing the victim’s operation of the pharmacy for about 40 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to C

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act or more;