손해배상(기)
1. The lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed.
2. The costs of retrial shall be borne by the plaintiff.
purport, purport, ..
1. The following facts, such as the confirmation of the judgment subject to a retrial, are apparent or apparent to this court.
(1) The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against B for a loan claim (Ulsan District Court No. 91 Ghana9544, 94 Ghana6052), and C testified. 2) The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against D for a loan claim (Ulsan District Court No. 95 Ghana14520, Ulsan District Court No. 9520, Busan District Court No. 95Na6223).
3) The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against F and G for the claim for return of the loan (Ulsan District Court Decision 91 Ghana9568) and H and I testified. 4) The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against J and K for the loan claim (Ulsan District Court Decision 90Da14433) and L testified.
B. The Plaintiff in the first criminal trial due to an accusation filed a complaint for perjury against C, E, H, I, or L, which was testified in each of the above lawsuits.
On September 18, 1996, the plaintiff was convicted of imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months for committing a crime that he had not been convicted of C, E, H, I, or L in the Ulsan District Court's Busan District Court's Busan District Court's Busan District Court's Busan District Court's Decision 96Da163, 213, 517 (Joint), 1467 (Joint)) and was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and three months for the Busan District Court's appellate court.
(Resan District Court 92No280). (c)
On May 29, 1997, the second criminal plaintiff filed a complaint for perjury again with C, D, and J who testified in the above criminal procedure after being released from the maturity of May 29, 199.
On July 6, 1999, the Plaintiff was sentenced to a conviction of one year by imprisonment with prison labor at the Ulsan District Court on this part of the accusation.
(Court of 99 order79) d.
On June 8, 2010, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit for damages and the judgment subject to a retrial. On June 8, 2010, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking the payment of damages (154,000,000 won as the Ulsan District Court Decision 201Da4109, and damages for delay).
The plaintiff did not have made an accusation, and the above witness issued a perjury.
Nevertheless, a judge's breach of duty.