(a) Defendant B shall indicate the annexed drawings among the real estate listed in the attached list, 1, 2, 3, 8, and 1.

가. 피고 B에 대한 청구에 관한 판단 원고가 의정부지방법원 고양지원 D 경매절차에서 2012. 1. 27. 피고 B가 소유하고 있던 별지 목록 기재 부동산(이하 ‘이 사건 건물’이라 한다) 중 1/2 지분을 매수하여 그 소유권을 취득한 사실, 피고 B가 현재 이 사건 건물 중 별지 도면 표시 ①, ②, ③, ⑧, ①의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 나동 목조 세멘와가지붕 단층주택 22.51㎡ 및 같은 도면 표시 ③, ④, ⑤, ⑥, ⑦, ⑧, ③의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 ㉣ 부분 세멘블럭조 세멘와가지붕 방 및 부엌 8.5㎡를 점유하고 있는 사실은 당사자 사이에 다툼이 없거나 갑 제1호증의 기재에 변론 전체의 취지를 종합하여 인정된다.

Therefore, Defendant B is obligated to deliver the above occupied part of the instant building to the Plaintiff.

B. In determining the claim against Defendant C, the Plaintiff purchased the ownership of 1/2 shares of the instant building owned by Defendant B on January 27, 2012 at the Goyang Branch D auction procedure for Goyang Branch D branching, and acquired the ownership thereof. Defendant C demanded the distribution on August 3, 201 from the above auction procedure; Defendant C indicated in the annexed drawings among the instant building at present, (9), (10), (11), (1), (1), (2), (3), and (4), and (9), and (22.5 square meters in proportion to the amount of the vessel connected each point in sequence, shall not be disputed between the parties, or shall be recognized by comprehensively taking into account the overall purport of pleadings in the statement in subparagraph 1.

However, in case of an auction of a house which is the object of the lease, a demand for distribution to an auction court is clearly expressed that the lessee with opposing power does not want the continuation of the lease relationship by himself/herself, and it can be viewed as an expression of intent for termination of the lease unless other special circumstances exist.