If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

On October 3, 2012, the Defendant was demanded to stop the disturbance and return home from the slope E, F, etc. of the Bapo Police Station, which the Defendant called out after receiving a report that the Defendant scams the disturbance, from around 00:55 on October 3, 2012.

Nevertheless, the Defendant spits spite, flap, etc. on the face of the above E, spite, spite, spite, flap, etc., and assaulted against slope E, such as a spite, spite, flap, flap, and flap, which continued to read, flap, etc., and a quif’s right hand, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of public order.

Summary of Evidence

Part of the Defendant’s legal statement, each police protocol against E/F/G, and the application of the damaged photographic statute

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act that selects respective fines;

2. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

3. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

4. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.