If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On December 17, 2012, the Defendant issued an order for singing and beer services as if he did not have the intent or ability to pay the drinking value at the “C” main points in Sinpo City B, 200:10, and as if he did not pay the said value, he received from the victim D of the said main place of business the instant main place of business the amount of KRW 40,000, including beer two disease (10,000) and one-time singing service (30,000).

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the defendant;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on simple receipts;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. According to Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the sentence of summary order shall be maintained in consideration of the fact that the defendant, on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, requested for the recovery of the right to request formal trial against the summary order, was absent on the trial date and his location was unknown, and that the defendant did not have reached an agreement with the majority of the defendants and the victim