“1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 30,00,000, which shall be paid to the Plaintiff in installments by paying KRW 400,000 per month from February 1, 2006 to 75 months. If the Defendant delays the payment at once, it shall lose the benefit of the installment payment, and shall pay the remainder by adding the delay damages at the rate of KRW 20,00 per annum from the date of delay to the date of full payment. 2. The remainder of the Plaintiff’s claim is waived; 3. The costs of litigation and adjustment shall be borne by each party.

2. According to these facts, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff who filed the instant lawsuit for the purpose of the extension of prescription amounting to 20% per annum from February 2, 2006 to September 30, 2015, and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum from the next day to the day of full payment, as stipulated in the instant conciliation, to the day following the day of loss of the principal amount of KRW 30,000,000 and the day after September 30, 2015.

3. The defendant's defense is alleged to have expired the statute of limitations. Thus, the defendant's defense of this case is proved to be run from the time when the right can be exercised (Article 166 (1) of the Civil Act). The defendant's defense of this case can be exercised from February 2, 2006, the day following the day when the claim for the conciliation payment of this case was lost the benefit of time, and it is apparent that the plaintiff filed the lawsuit of this case on January 18, 2016, before the expiration of 10 years (Article 165 (2) and (1) of the Civil Act) of the statute of limitations of the conciliation payment of this case. Thus, the defendant's defense is without merit.

4. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable.