통신비밀보호법위반방조
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and suspension of qualifications for each of six months.
However, the above imprisonment for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
No person shall record or listen to conversations between others that are not open to the public, without going through the provisions of Acts, such as the Protection of Communications Secrets Act.
On June 201, the Defendant notified the time and place for installation of CCTV, requesting that the CCTV installer, who had been engaged in ordinary transactions, called the CCTV, to “after the call to install CCTV at the Ma-gu house,” and requesting that the Defendant “after the time and place for installation of CCTV,” in comparison with the lawsuit against D (C and de facto marriage).
Therefore, on June 201, 201, the Defendant sent the CCTV to the residence of D located in F during Mapoposman, and introduced C to E, and C had E install CCTV so that it can not be seen in the TV spackers located in his/her dwelling space.
As a result, the Defendant aided and abetted the crime by facilitating the recording of the conversation between C and the other party to the conversation.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Statement made to D by the police;
1. Copy of the police statement of E;
1. Decision of Gwangju District Court branch court (2012 High Court Decision 113, 168) (Evidence Records No. 49 pages);
1. Decision of the Gwangju High Court (2013No67) (Evidence No. 63)
1. Application of CCTV installation photograph Acts and subordinate statutes;
1. Article 16(1)1 and Article 3 of the former Protection of Communications Secrets Act (Amended by Act No. 1229, Jan. 14, 2014); Article 32(1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts
1. Article 32 (2), Article 55 (1) 3 and 5 of the Criminal Act for statutory mitigation;
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter referred to as "the reason for sentencing") is to recognize and reflect the defendant's mistake, the defendant is likely to cause the crime of this case upon the request of pro-Japanese, and it appears that there is no cost acquired by the defendant, the defendant has no record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine, and the defendant's age;