If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On August 2, 2015, at around 00:30 on August 2, 2015, the Defendant carried out Da and body fighting in front of the “C D D D Dental” in front of the “C D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D dental, who was under influence of alcohol, and the Inspector F, etc., who was the police officer of the Chungcheongnam-do Police Station E box dispatched after receiving a report of 112 while working for the franc, controlled the Defendant, and the Inspector F was the police officer.

The police of the Republic of Korea are different.

In the sound of this buck, the background F was assaulted by: (a) the upper part of the Fbucks to the right side of the F due to the outbreak, (b) the front part of the F, and (c) the F, the front part of the F, once.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the maintenance of order, and at the same time, the defendant injured the FF (55 years old) of the injured person, requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Some statements made in the suspect examination protocol of each police officer against the defendant or D;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Medical certificate (F);

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which prevents the execution of official duties by assaulting a police officer on duty, and at the same time, inflicting an injury on a police officer, is the circumstances unfavorable to the defendant, and the fact that the defendant has no criminal record is favorable to the defendant.

In addition to the above circumstances, all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case shall be determined as per the disposition.