On March 12, 2014, the Defendant appeared to take an oath as a witness of the fraud case against the above court No. 2013 senior 2936 B, which was 1 Dong-gu District Court No. 4, 16:00, which was able to see the Government.

When the defendant makes a statement at an investigative agency, the defendant asked questions to the effect that the defendant (B) did not make a statement to the effect that he would have given a witness a house sale price received from the victim C. The witness present. The defendant asked questions to the effect that "The witness would not make a statement to the effect that he would have given the defendant a house sale price received from the victim C." The defendant was living together with the victim C and the victim D, and the defendant knew that he would have given money from the victim D, and the witness was given the witness. The defendant asked the counsel in B that "the witness knows that the defendant would have known the amount of KRW 25 million to the witness anywhere," and "the witness would have known the fact that the defendant borrowed money from the victim's husband and wife," and "the witness asked the defendant about how the defendant lent money from the victim to the victim or how he would have borrowed money from the victim," and there is no question about the source of the defendant's answer to the fact that "the defendant would have borrowed money from the victim."

However, the Defendant was aware that B received money under the name of the purchase price for a house, not in the name of the loan from D or C, and that D or C borrowed money from a bond business operator introduced from D or C to pay the money to B as the purchase price for the house, and that B remitted part of the money received from D or C to the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant himself.