A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Defendant

A is the owner of C Home Lyro Oil Transport Vehicle, and Defendant B is the operator of the “E Gas station” located in Youngcheon City D.

Defendant

A A proposed, at a place not known to the end of February 2019, Defendant B, “A, if sold, to the borrower of the cargo vehicle, is good, and it would be good to sell the oil to the borrower of the cargo vehicle using the home-rol vehicle in Korea, and only 100 won per liter, such as sales, would be changed.” The Defendant B consented to this, and the Defendants were willing to sell the oil to the borrower of the cargo vehicle as vehicle fuel.

As above, even if the Defendants conspired to sell light oil as vehicle fuel, they would like to enter the appearance of the Defendants in normal terms with a limited quantity of 189.21 liter around March 1, 2019, and transported oil, such as a franchisor oil storage tank in the above E-ownership tank, to the Defendant A’s home-ro oil tank, and sold it to the neighboring side of the Yongcheon-si Franchisor Corporation, and then sold the H cargo vehicle operated by G with a large amount of 50,400 won, and 30,000 won to the above E-ownership station, 189.21 liter via the oil subsidy settlement terminal around 21:44, 2019, and 200 won to pay 228,000 won with the cargo welfare card held by G, and 30,000 won to receive the above cargo subsidy from G to 30,400 to 130,291.29

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol on G, I, J, K, L, M,O, P, and Q;

1. Inspection of the quality and distribution of petroleum products;