2. The defendant does not pay the above fine.

On June 14, 2016, around 03:05, the Defendant driven the CFD car volume to the left by driving the CFD car volume in the direction of interest in the front of the intersection of the C BhD in the direction of interest at the Eup/Myeon.

Since there is an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed, a person engaged in the driving of motor vehicles has a duty of care to safely enter the intersection by checking the signal, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not stop even though the signal of the signal was red, and did not enter the intersection due to the negligence of entering the intersection, and shocked the left-hand side of the victim D (ma, 38 years old)'s E-on-on-hand side of the hurged vehicle, which is normally carried out in accordance with the straight line from the inner interest side, into the front side of the lurged vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim D, such as the injury to the alley of the peltod floor, the injury to the victim F (ma, 42 years of age) of the peltod floor, and the plebing of the pleke wall that requires approximately 3 weeks of treatment, and the injury to the peltod passenger G (ma, 59 years of age) of the peltod vehicle requiring approximately 10 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the actual survey report and diagnosis report;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents under Relevant Acts concerning criminal facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;