A Imprisonment with prison labor for two months, for two months, for two months, and for three months, for each of the defendants C.

, however, the defendant.

[Criminal Justice] On September 20, 2019, Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on September 20, 201, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 17, 2020.

Defendant

B On February 13, 2020, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced 1 year of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. and decided February 21, 2020.

Defendant

C On September 27, 2017, at the Seoul Northern District Court, sentenced four months of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc., and was released on October 26, 2017 by the ruling of revocation of detention. On January 18, 2018, the said ruling became final and conclusive and conclusive on the same day, and on February 13, 2020, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced one year and ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. and became final and conclusive on February 21, 2020.

【Criminal Facts】

In order to raise the living expenses, the Defendants planned to cut off the cell phone from the soup on the soup bank, and to make it commercialized by settling the “D”, “E”, etc. using the said cell phone. While Defendant A steals the cell phone, Defendant C shall monitor the surrounding areas, and Defendant C shall take the role of setting up a vehicle around the place where the crime was committed while Defendant A and Defendant B committed a crime. Defendant A and Defendant C agreed to commit a crime by taking away and moving the vehicle of Defendant C along with Defendant B, when the place where the crime was committed was committed.

1. Special larceny;

A. From March 1, 2019 to around 02:30 on the same day, the Defendants were waiting for the Defendant C to set up a car in the vicinity of the soup soup, and Defendant A and Defendant B discovered the victim who was frying the subject of the crime.

After that, Defendant B reported the network around, and Defendant B.