채무부존재확인
1. It does not exist the obligations specified in Paragraph 1 of the attached Table to the Plaintiff’s Intervenor A’s Intervenor.
1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in combination with the whole purport of the pleadings as stated in Gap evidence Nos. 11, 12, 26, 27, and Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5 through 9, and 12 (including a serial number, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply):
Plaintiff
A 1) The E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”) prior to the declaration of bankruptcy
(2) On May 4, 2005, Plaintiff A and Plaintiff A entered into a credit transaction agreement with Plaintiff A on May 4, 2005, with a loan of KRW 150 million, and with the maturity date on May 4, 2008, and thereafter, E and Plaintiff A paid the loan to Plaintiff A according to the said agreement. After extending the maturity date of the said credit transaction agreement on May 3, 2010, E and Plaintiff A entered into a credit transaction agreement with Plaintiff on May 4, 2010 for the repayment of the said loan, and on May 4, 2015, E again entered into a credit transaction agreement with Plaintiff A on December 31, 2009, with the maturity date on May 4, 2015. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 21170, Dec. 31, 2009; Presidential Decree No. 25805, Dec. 31, 2014>
The loan amount of KRW 12,00,000 on December 31, 2014, 112,000,000 on December 31, 2014; 112,00,000 3,797,290 on May 4, 2010 ( May 4, 2005) was executed on May 4, 2015; 150,00,000,000,000,880,70,006 aggregate of KRW 262,00,000,000,000,000,26262,000,000,000,000,677,97,97,963) was executed on the loan amount of KRW 20,000 on May 4, 2015 (the loan amount of KRW 200,70,000) as above; and
C. The execution of the loan to the Plaintiff C.