However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On September 27, 2018, the Defendant, in front of C cafeteria in B around September 23:15, 2018, and “the Defendant is under the influence of alcohol.”

112 reported to the effect that “A bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a police officer called up, who is solicited to return home from E by the police officer belonging to the D Unit,” the police officer:

No fule shall be fule.

"I wish to board without permission by opening a bath, rear door of patrol," and assault the E's flabbbbbbling and walking the left side of E one time to the right edge, and interfere with police officers' legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of report 112.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The suspended sentence is against the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act; there are records of being subject to criminal punishment several times, including violent criminal records; the Defendant’s age, sex, criminal conduct, environment, circumstances before and after the commission of the crime; and various conditions of sentencing should be taken into account;