When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On March 1, 2017, the Defendant assaulted the victim on about 14 days, such as 10:0 on March 1, 2017, around 10:50, at Coina or factory, Coina, Ltd., Ltd., 174-50 Doo-ro 56 Doo-ro, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, and the victim C (32 Doo) and the victim C (32 Doo), thereby making two times the head of the victim’s cell phone, and breabing the victim’s flab with his hand, thereby damaging the victim’s sp

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statements of the witness C and D;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of suspect C by the police (including D's statement);

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A medical certificate of injury (the defendant and defense counsel unilaterally committed an assault against the injured person and did not do so, and the accused committed an assault against the injured person;

Even if it is alleged to the effect that it constitutes a legitimate act merely because it was the victim’s unilateral attack during the process of defending the victim’s unilateral attack. However, according to the evidence as seen earlier, the victim consistently stated that “The victim, first of all at the time of the crime of this case, prices the victim’s head with a cell phone at the victim’s head, and the victim consistently stated that he/she was the victim’s head with a cell phone, and that he/she was assaulted by the victim at the time of the crime.”

D also considered that the defendant prices twice the victim's head in a mobile phone.

(3) The victim's injury diagnosis report was not issued on the day of the crime of this case, or the victim's statements, etc. were made in light of the fact that the victim's injury diagnosis report was not issued on the day of the crime of this case, and the victim's injury action was caused by the Defendant's assault on the day of the crime of this case.

It is reasonable to see that the victim is the victim, and 4. The victim is first.