Defendant

If I does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

Any corporation which intends to carry on the security business shall obtain permission from the Commissioner General of the Local Police Agency having jurisdiction over the location of its principal office by specifying the security business which it intends to carry on

Defendant

I was a representative of the intra-corporate director of the (State)C from January 16, 2012 to June 25, 2015.

1. Defendant I, as the representative of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City (State)C, provided security services in the Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City D market without obtaining permission from the Commissioner General of the National Police Agency from April 17, 2015 to June 25, 2015.

2. Defendant (State)B Defendant (State) operated security business without obtaining permission from the local Commissioner General of the National Police Agency as referred to in the preceding paragraph in relation to the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Legal statement by the witness J;

1. Some of the witness K’s legal statement;

1. Some of the statements made to Defendant I concerning the suspect interrogation protocol (two times) and some of the written statements made by Defendant I concerning Defendant I

1. Application of the contract on consignment of commercial building management services, D commercial building management system, certified copy of the corporate registry (stock company B) law to around May 2012;

1. Article 28 (2) 1 and Article 4 (1) of the Security Business Act; Defendant B who selects a fine: Articles 30, 28 (2) 1 and 4 (1) of the Security Business Act; Articles 30, 28 (2) 1 and 4 (1) of the Act;

1. Defendant I confined in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;