However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. While the Defendant acquired and kept a sign, such as a car for the disabled that was issued by the head of Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government head of Dong for Promotion, the Defendant used the car number to be changed to the number of the car for the disabled to be used when using the car number of the Defendant’s driving B.

On July 2015, the Defendant removed the film of the sign, such as the foregoing disabled vehicle, etc., from the Defendant’s office located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, and then deleted four back metric tons of the number indicated, and entered them into “B” into “B” in the name of the Defendant’s office.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a sign 1, such as a car using the disabled in the name of the head of Si/Gu, which is a public document.

2. On October 31, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 12:30, at a astronomical public parking lot located in the 1015 (Ocheon-dong) as Gangdong-gu Seoul, Gangdong-gu, Seoul; (b) parked a motor vehicle for learning listed in paragraph (1) in a parking zone exclusively for disabled persons; (c) placed the motor vehicle on the front glass window of the said motor vehicle as if it was actually issued a mark, such as a motor vehicle for disabled persons, which is a forged public document, and exercised the same.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A letter of detection of a disabled vehicle sign or an illegally used vehicle;

1. Illegal parking photographs;

1. Application of statutes on a copy of the disabled motor vehicle sign;

1. Article 225 of the Criminal Act (the point of Article 25 of the Official Document) and Articles 229 and 225 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (the point of uttering of forged official document);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (Consideration of the background and details of the crime, degree of social hazard, confession and reflective nature, and the primary charge);

1. Article 48 (1) 2 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;