Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, it is justifiable for the lower court to have maintained the first instance judgment that found the Defendant guilty of the modified facts charged on the grounds stated in its reasoning, and there was no error by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the crime of fraud and the Infant Care Act, the crime of violation of retroactive legislation, and the principle of statutory punishment for the crime, etc.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.