beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.09.13 2017고합183

특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)

Text

Defendant

A and D Imprisonment for two years, Defendant B and C, respectively, shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and six months.

except that this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Defendant D] On November 27, 2014, the Seoul Eastern District Court sentenced 1 year to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for fraud, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 5, 2014.

[Defendant D] On July 5, 2007, the prosecutor of the court held that the J corporation obtained permission to manufacture and sell F in the indictment.

In addition, E was charged with writing, as seen later, E was permitted to manufacture and sell, and J corporation is a consigned manufacturer.

Food and Drug Safety Administration (hereinafter referred to as the "Food and Drug Safety Administration") in 2013.

The term "sale approval" means the manufacture approval under Article 31, Paragraph 2 of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act, which is the manufacture and marketing approval for F as an agenda for a liver disease.

The term "items A, which have been used as a medicine that actually deductions the use for which the F had been permitted, and have been aware of a wide range of demand, as seen above, refers to the reproduction of F Reproduction No. 25 (1) 1 of the Regulation on Product License, Report, and Examination of F Reproduction, and the type, size, and quantity of effective ingredients (in the case of liquid preparations, concentration), type, efficacy and effect, efficacy and effect, and the same usage and capacity."

While the person who is eligible to receive funds for the manufacture and sales permission, the defendant A was to receive 300 million won necessary to promote the business from the victim G through the defendant A.

In addition, Defendant A received KRW 200 million from the injured party, 30 million, which was mentioned as necessary for Defendant D to carry out the above project together with Defendant B and Defendant C, in total of KRW 500 million from the injured party, and the remaining KRW 200 million was delivered to Defendant D, and the remaining KRW 200 million was used by Defendant A, Defendant B, and Defendant C by dividing the amount of KRW 67 million in terms of the cost of performing their duties, etc.

Defendant

On April 9, 2009, A, Defendant B, and Defendant C are the victims of the I cafeteria located in H around the Government-Si around 19, 200 to F from September 1, 2009.