On November 30, 2006, the Defendant subscribed to the Victim Samsung Life Insurance Co., Ltd.’s “Non-Distribution Escopic Life Insurance Co., Ltd.” (hereinafter “Scopic Life Insurance Co., Ltd.”) that provides multiple hospitalization daily allowances according to the number of hospitalization days, and subscribed to the “Scopic Life Insurance Co., Ltd.” (hereinafter “Scopic Life Insurance Co., Ltd.”) insurance of the Victim Samsung Life Insurance Co., Ltd., which provides multiple hospitalization daily

Although it is possible for the Defendant to take out a multiple insurance policy as above, he was able to receive the insurance money for a long time and receive the insurance money. From December 24, 2007 to January 3, 2008, the Defendant hospitalized the insurance money with chronic organ infection C located in Kim Sea-si B from around December 24, 2007 to January 3, 2008. On January 4, 2008, the Defendant claimed insurance money of KRW 1,100,000 to the Victim Samsung Life Insurance Co., Ltd., and received the above insurance money on the same day.

The Defendant, including that, from around that time to May 21, 2014, received insurance proceeds of KRW 32,761,980 by deceiving the damaged insurance companies in the same manner as the written list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Some statements made against the defendant during the police interrogation protocol;

1. Each police statement made against D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, andO;

1. A summary of 25 inpatients patients in a P hospital (medical analysis);

1. Arrangement of hospitalization data;

1. Investigation report (Attachment of mobile phone call details and credit card transaction details);

1. Investigation report (to analyze the table of hospitalization of suspect A);

1. Advice on medical treatment for A;

1. Data on insurance companies A (the details of insurance coverage, a written confirmation of hospitalization, and a claim for insurance proceeds for accident);

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes 1, 2, and 3 to the A case analysis data;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Where the reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes [the scope of recommendations] is the reason for sentencing under Article 38(1)2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes [the scope of recommendations] and Article 1 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment (10 million won or less) [the victim] is also responsible for the occurrence of a crime or the expansion of damage [the circumstances considered] - basic matters: