beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2012.08.16 2011가단43750

소유권이전등기절차이행

Text

1. The Plaintiff, among each real estate listed in the separate sheet,

A. As to each of the shares of Defendant B, May 3, 2011.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship between the parties 1) The Plaintiff is a clan organized around January 1974 with the purpose of getting a common ancestor among the descendants of Fmph 21 years of age group G, who were the descendants of Fmph 21 years of age group, and being a common ancestor group. Defendant B is a Fmph 28 years of age group, Defendant C's denial of the network H, Defendant D, and E are children of Fmph 25 years of age group, Fmph 25 years of age group (Death on June 21, 1931). Defendant C was a child of Fmph 25 years of age group (Death on November 29, 1978), Defendant C&N as the above her husband and children, Defendant C&N as the above her husband and her husband, Defendant C&N as the above her husband and her children, and Defendant C&N as the above her husband and her children, Defendant C&N as the above her husband and her children.

B. The instant land in the name of each real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant land”) is registered under the ownership transfer registration of real estate in the name of the Defendant B and the deceased H on August 30, 1980, with each of the 1/2 shares registered under the Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Ownership of Real Estate.

C. The inheritance-related network H died on January 16, 1995, and there was Defendant D, E, and Nonparty U, the wife of Defendant C, E, and Nonparty U as its heir. As to the deceased’s share in the instant land, the deceased’s shares in the deceased H still remains in the name of the deceased H.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 7, 11, 12, and 44 (including branch numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff asserted that the land of this case was purchased by the deceased J and donated it to the plaintiff for the plaintiff's first use as the plaintiff's mountain, and thereafter, the graves, such as the deceased I, J, etc. were gathered and managed in unregistered state. On August 30, 1980, the defendant transferred the title trust under the name of defendant B and the deceased H. Thus, the defendant asserts that the plaintiff, who expressed his/her intention to terminate the title trust with respect to the above land by delivery of a duplicate of the complaint of this case, is liable to implement the registration procedure for ownership transfer as to each co-ownership of the above land.