손해배상(자)
1. The part against the defendant in the judgment of the first instance is revoked.
2. The plaintiff's claim against the defendant is dismissed.
3...
The court's explanation of this case is identical to the reasoning of the first instance judgment, since the court's explanation of this case is the same as the ground of the first instance judgment, except for the addition of the following two (5) of the grounds of the first instance judgment after adding the following (2) of the grounds of the first instance judgment
(4) The plaintiff's claim against the defendant C on April 25, 2012 on the premise that the plaintiff's claim against the defendant is the deceased's heir is without merit. Since the defendant C alleged to the effect that the deceased's claim against the judgment on March 3, 200 and the deceased's claim against the defendant was denied since he renounced inheritance against the deceased, in full view of the purport of the whole pleadings as to the statement of evidence No. 5, the defendant C and D filed a report of renunciation of inheritance with the Suwon District Court 2012Ra537 on March 19, 2012, and the plaintiff's claim against the defendant C on the premise that the deceased's claim against the defendant is the deceased's heir, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant should be dismissed on the ground that the plaintiff's claim against the defendant is without merit. Since the part against the defendant in the judgment of the first instance was accepted differently, the part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance which lost the defendant's claim against the defendant is dismissed.