A. Defendant B is an intention to operate a member of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D D (hereinafter “Defendant Council member”) and Defendant C is a counseling director of the Defendant Council member.

On May 2015, the Plaintiff was consulted by the Defendant Council member about the improvement of the face of his/her face.

First of all, through consultation with Defendant C, who is a counseling director, the Plaintiff was expected to undergo local transplantation and practical printing operations in the amount of KRW 3.3 million, and thereafter the Plaintiff consulted with Defendant B.

On May 18, 2016, the Plaintiff received from Defendant B a local transplant and practical painting (hereinafter “instant surgery”).

Defendant B recovered a local area from the Plaintiff’s her retirement part, transplanted it to the face, and inserted a room on both sides, and performed a printing operation.

Defendant B, when there were symptoms of failure in the face in the process of laping, added up the number of spawn to the spawn, and carried out a procedure to separate the spawn part between the spawn and the spawnary spawn part (hereinafter “spawn correction procedure”).

On May 20, 2016, the Plaintiff was admitted to the Defendant Council on May 20, 2016 to observe the progress, and the side was observed around the left eye and face.

Accordingly, Defendant B took measures such as medication for the relaxation of side species.

On May 25, 2016, the Plaintiff appealed to the Defendant Council members about the left-hand hole and pains of face, etc., and as a result, blood species were found in the part of the surgery.

Accordingly, the medical personnel of the Defendant Council was taking measures such as smoking for the relevant father, and then administering algora in algora.

On June 29, 2016, the Plaintiff complained of sheshesheshel and pains on the left side.

As a result of the verification, dynasium was found in the repeated part of the office inserted into the left side of the left side, and the medical professionals of the defendant were removed from the repeated office, and the medical professionals of the defendant took measures to prescribe anti-biotics.

(b) the relevant medical knowledge;