Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

On March 1, 2013, at least 22:30, the Defendant: (a) knew of the fact that the Defendant committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment by causing a traffic accident while drunk driving; (b) falsely stated that he/she driven a MP5 vehicle to a police officer affiliated with the Seoul Mapo Police Station, who was dispatched to the site, and continued to prepare a false statement on the situation of traffic accident as if he/she driven the MF5 vehicle under the influence of alcohol at the request of C at the Seoul Mapo Police Station’s traffic accident investigation department, and followed a brea5 vehicle under the influence of alcohol.

Accordingly, the defendant let C escape as an offender.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on detection of a host driver;

1. Relevant Article 151 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense. Article 151 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The primary reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is the order of provisional payment, and other factors for sentencing as shown in the argument of the case are considered.