However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date of the final judgment.

At around 02:00 on August 1, 2016, the Defendant committed assault, such as: (a) the Defendant: (b) expressed the left elbow of the defect that the Defendant attempted to restrain, and (c) expressed the elbow of the D, when she took a bath to D, who was dispatched to the site after having received 112 reports; and (d) took a bath to D, who was employed by the head of the police station of the Suwon Police Station C District; (b) the chest of the D, who was sent to the site on one occasion by drinking the left hand; and (c) continuously talked the way and take a bath.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports by police officers and crime prevention.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. A written statement of E, F and G;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation and Social Service Order [Scope of Recommendation] There is no person who has a basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties [decision of sentence] [Judgment of sentence] Although the defendant was punished by a fine for the same kind of crime in the past, the crime of this case was committed by assaulting a police officer's chest side and chron, thereby obstructing the performance of official duties again. However, under the influence of alcohol, it was a crime under the influence of alcohol, and there was no significant injury to police officers. It is so decided as per Disposition in light of all the reasons for sentencing.