beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2021.03.25 2020고단7477

감염병의예방및관리에관한법률위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In order to prevent the spread of an infectious disease upon the outbreak of the infectious disease, the head of the relevant Si/Gun/Gu, a Mayor/Do Governor, or the head of the relevant Si/Gun/Gu shall take measures, such as hospitalized or isolation at an appropriate place, and any person shall comply with

On September 10, 2020, the Defendant entered Korea in the United States on September 10, 202, and was subject to measures of isolation from September 10, 2020 to September 12, 200, at the Defendant’s home located in the area B located in the Gan-si population from September 10, 2020 to September 24, 200.

Nevertheless, on September 22, 2020, the Defendant left his residence from around 12:54 to 15:24, and violated the measures of isolation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to issue a notice on isolation of a written accusation issued by the defendant C’s statutory statement, or a receipt of an isolation notice to a person who has been issued with the receipt of the isolation notice, CCTV photographs at isolation sites

1. Article 79-3 subparagraph 5 of the Act on the Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases and the Selection of Fines concerning the relevant criminal facts, and Article 79-3 subparagraph 3 of the Infectious Disease Control and Prevention Act, and Article 47;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. There is a question as to whether a person, who was demanded by the relevant agency for the reason of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, or for response to infectious diseases, violates quarantine measures without any special reason, and without reason, violates the Korean society and local communities significantly. In order to prevent the spread of infectious diseases, there is a need for doubt as to whether the Defendant’s speech and behavior in light of the defendant’s words and behavior, the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, environment, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, etc., and the various conditions of sentencing indicated in the arguments and records of the instant case are considered as follows.