beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2013.04.19 2013고정204

사기

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 24, 2010, the Defendant: (a) called a cell phone with which the contents of credit loans are reported in a daily information log; and (b) provided a loan consultation, the Defendant: (c) provided a loan service provider (one name B) with a telephone call, and then provided a cash license of KRW 1400-15 million, per week; (d) the type of a car must be selected in black. The type of a car must be: (e) a certified copy, a certificate of personal seal impression, a certificate of personal seal impression, and a certificate of personal identification; (e) the document is accompanied by a certified copy of the resident registration, a certificate of personal seal impression, and a copy of a certificate of personal identification at the place of business of a modern automobile C; and (e) drafted

As a result, the subsidiary company of Hyundai Capital made payment of KRW 31,200,000 for the said vehicle to Hyundai Motor. On November 25, 2010, the Defendant received the call that the vehicle applied by the employee of Hyundai Motor Vehicle Business was released from the vehicle stored in the Pungdong Motor Vehicle, and that it would be delivered at the Pungdong Motor Vehicle Storage Station. On November 25, 2010, the Defendant called the borrower (one person B) by telephone to the lender (one person B), and at around 12:00 on the same day, delivered the vehicle to the lender at the same place and received KRW 14,00,000 for the said vehicle.

On December 6, 2010, the above vehicles were loaded at the Incheon port and exported to Vietnam through the F Trade Company.

However, the Defendant received vehicle installment from Hyundai Capital, which is a de facto subsidiary company to finance, and received 31,200,000 won from the above installment, as if the Defendant actually purchased a vehicle, without notifying the above lending business entity and D that he purchased the vehicle for the purpose of receiving the loan.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (related to A account of a suspect), copies of examination marks (new ones), investigation reports (report on the results of telephone conversations of a complainant representative);

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;