Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

No one who operates a truck on the road shall obstruct the measurement of the load capacity of the vehicle in violation of his/her duty to pass through the lane or place where the load measuring equipment is installed.

Nevertheless, around 05:08 on September 28, 2018, the Defendant obstructed the measurement of the load load of the said vehicle by operating a c9.5 tons large cargo vehicle, which was owned by the KNG Kimpo-si Kimpo-si, 319-23, in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, and entering the said road.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. An accusation against a violation of traffic obligation on the measuring lane;

1. Statement of accusation;

1. A written accusation;

1. Screening pictures on the violation of the lane for measuring the cargo wheel;

1. The current status of examination of the violation of the cargo lane measuring lanes;

1. The defendant asserts to the effect that he had no intention to violate the Road Act because he/she passed the lane with a misleading knowledge of his/her fault. According to the above evidence, the defendant not only affixed a regulation mark on the prohibition of entry into and departure from the road on the road of the general nives, but also passed on the road of the general nives on four occasions from July 31, 2018 to September 21, 2018 before the crime of this case was committed. The defendant was aware of the fact that he/she passed to the general lives road of the lives of the lives, which passed through the same lives as before the crime of this case before the crime of this case and passed through the lives road without measuring the nives quantity. Therefore, it is reasonable to view that the defendant's argument is not accepted. Accordingly, the defendant's argument is not accepted).

1. Relevant Article 15 subparagraph 5 of the Road Act and Article 78 (3) of the same Act concerning criminal facts, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;