beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.05.26 2017고합95

특수공무집행방해치상등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On November 2, 2006, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2 million from the Daegu District Court due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving). On December 21, 2015, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million from the said court as the same crime.

[Criminal facts]

1. On March 15, 2017, the Defendant: (a) while under the influence of alcohol at around 00:13, the Defendant driven a DNA car in the section of approximately 1km from the third deputy head of the trade in the Daegu East-gu New Cancer Co., Ltd. to approximately 1km on the front of the Daegu-dong-gu Seoul-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong

2. On March 15, 2017, the Defendant was under the influence of a license or drinking, as described in paragraph 1, on the street in front of Eart located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, as well as on March 15, 2017, and was demanded to stop from a slope G belonging to the F District of the police station in the Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Police Station, or a policeman.

The Defendant: (a) requested a police officer to comply with a drinking test after setting up a vehicle; and (b) requested a police officer to know “I”

T. T. B. T. T. T. T. T. T. T.

“A continuous operation of the vehicle,” while continuing to drive the vehicle, the Habman demanded the vehicle to stop the vehicle completely, and the slope G to stop the front part of the driver’s seat of the Defendant’s vehicle while the slope G driven the vehicle in the future, which is a dangerous object by raising the speed of the vehicle as it is, the vehicle was driven by the victim G (48 years old) with the window of the driver’s seat of the said vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties of police officers on the crackdown on drinking driving by using a dangerous object, and as a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim G by completely completing the right-hand part, which requires treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to G and H;

1. The driver's license register of one motor vehicle that notifies the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. A medical certificate;