Despite the absence of evidence to see, the Defendant reported the smoking of marijuana to the investigation agency without clear evidence, and there was an intention to commit a crime without doubt at the time of reporting.

2. Examining the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court and the circumstances appropriately presented by the lower court after comparing them with records, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone, which, at the time when the Defendant reported E as smoking in marijuana, was aware of its falsity.

It is difficult to see it.

The judgment of the court below is just and acceptable, and there is no error of law by mistake of facts as alleged by the prosecutor.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.