A. The lower court’s sentencing is too inappropriate.

B. The lower court’s sentencing is too uncomfortable.

2. Considering the fact that the crime of this case is not good, that the defendant committed the crime of this case again even if he had the same criminal record at several times, and that the blood alcohol concentration is high, strict punishment against the defendant is needed.

However, considering the defendant's depth of mistake, the degree of injury suffered by the victim is not excessive, the distance of the defendant's driving while drunk is not long, the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and other conditions of sentencing specified in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below is judged appropriate, and is too heavy or unreasonable. Thus, the above argument by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.