2. The fact that the defendant's judgment on the grounds for appeal is against his own mistake and does not repeat again, and that there are some circumstances that can be considered in the living environment of the defendant is favorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, the defendant was driving without the driver's license when the driver's license was revoked due to the previous crime of drunk driving, and the reason why the crime was committed and the attitude is not good, and that the distance of the defendant's driving without the driver's license is considerable is disadvantageous to the defendant.

In addition, in full view of the Defendant’s age, character, conduct and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and all of the sentencing factors indicated in the instant records and pleadings, such as the circumstances after the crime was committed, the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.