Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

On July 11, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for the obstruction of performance of official duties in the Suwon District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 17th of the same month.

On February 6, 2014, the Defendant removed a direction-setting system equivalent to KRW 5,00,00 in a toilet from the floor and damaged goods used by public offices by removing a lid lids in an amount equivalent to KRW 247,00 in the market price, in his/her own hand, at the Gunpo-si located in 511 of Si/Gunpo-si, Gunpo-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: The application of Acts and subordinate statutes of investigation reports;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties.

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Consideration of the fact that the crime of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is against the reason for sentencing, compensation for the damage, equity between the case where the judgment was rendered concurrently with the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties for which the judgment has become final and conclusive