For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court reversed the judgment of the first instance that found the Defendant guilty on the facts charged of this case on the grounds that there was no proof of crime.

The judgment below

In light of the records, we affirm the judgment of the court below.

In so doing, contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court did not err by misapprehending the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by violating the principle of court-oriented trials and the principle of direct deliberation.

Therefore, by the assent of all participating Justices, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.