When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a rocketing car.

On May 18, 2019, the Defendant driving the said car at around 04:53, and driving the said car at around 04:53, and driving the three-lane road prior to C at the time of the Si interesting, along the new IIC bank in the Si interesting ICT, at the same three-lane speed.

Since there are two crossings where signal lights and crosswalks are installed, it is necessary to confirm whether a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a motor vehicle driving the motor vehicle using the intersection by reducing the speed and by properly examining the front side of the motor vehicle, and there was a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle according to the traffic signal to prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and got the victim D (the age 22) who was crossing the crosswalk in accordance with the Mad pedestrian's signals, due to the negligence of the Defendant's failure in driving the crosswalk in violation of the signal, and got the above victim D (the age 22) over the road.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, which caused approximately six weeks of treatment to the left-hand slots that need to be treated.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written statement A and D;

1. A medical certificate (D);

1. Application of the actual survey report, on-site map of traffic accidents, on-site photographs, and relevant Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the ground of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is an act of causing an injury to a victim crossing a crosswalk due to the negligence of operating a motor vehicle in violation of the signal signal even though the defendant was a stop signal, and the nature of the crime is not good.

However, it is against the fact that the defendant acknowledges the crime and reflects the mistake.