However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On December 21, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 250,00,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) from the Suwon Friwon on December 21, 2007 and a fine of KRW 2,50,000 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) from the Suwon Friwon on February 5, 201.

On January 22, 2017, at around 01:30, the Defendant driven B car in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of approximately 0.159% from the 1km section to the 47 new apartment road in the same city unit, from the Nam apartment located in the Jeju Jeju Jeju Jeju Jeju Jeju Jeju Jeju Jeju Do.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. On-site photographs of the accident site and reports on the detection of the driver involved;

1. Previous conviction: Application of a written inquiry about criminal history and a written investigation report (Attachment of a summary order for drinking driving) by statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (the favorable circumstances among the reasons for sentencing) - The defendant, despite having been sentenced two times to a fine for the same kind of crime, is again prevented from committing this case, even though he was sentenced to a fine,. - The defendant has lost his normal recognition ability due to drinking, thereby shocking the central separation stand, and the circumstances leading to the crackdown on drinking are not good. The defendant is fully aware of the facts of crime. - The defendant has no past record of being sentenced to